More Tragic Gaming

A mysterious disembodied voice has commented on my Tragic Gaming post with something a bit too substantive for me to respond to in the comments box, so I’m going to do it here.  Besides, it gives me more time to make up for… time.

As far as defining a tragedy goes, whatever definition you choose to give it seems fine and well. However, we have to remember that everyone is going to experience things differently in relation to their own history and the story’s intrinsic relevance to their lives either past, present, or hopes of the future. As such, a tragedy for one could be…well possibly satire for another? In some sense at least, if they’d experienced the same thing perhaps? All I’m trying to say is it isn’t something we can exactly nail to the wall. It is the custard pie effect of definitions.

Well, if I were to say “Oedipus Rex is a tragedy” what you say would hold water.  But my “(morals+(empathy/anger+pain-happiness))+(RE(relative experience) * length/impact) = tragedy” equation allows for this.  I’m talking about what must be at work, in a culture, to create tragedy.  Not comparing the tragedy of one culture to the tragedy of another.

Same goes for Video Games, not every game has a specific goal, objective, or in some case a set structure or rules. I would like to think that some games are made just to be played, and not to be rewarded for that play. Harvest Moon comes to mind, a game that in most incarnations can go on forever just farming. Your reward? Money to buy more crops and house extensions, extensions that are either for the most part useless or allow for more game-play options. Sure, they’re rewards, but then you still don’t necessarily have an end.

We’ve stretched the definition of “game” quite a bit.  Regardless, I do think Harvest Moon falls into my definition of a Video Game.  There are set rules, a goal, and the player is told to achieve it.  Mainly success at maintaining a farm and finding a wife (or husband).  And the game provides you the means to maintain the farm and woo the spouse.  The reward in Harvest Moon is every time you get paid, and when you get married (can’t you have children in some too?).  Which is why Harvest Moon is practically neverending, the reward only builds onto more of the game.

Maybe now the case isn’t as much as it was back in the day, when after finally defeating Bowser and finding the freaking Princess, we get nothing. That was then. Now we’ve come to expect more. Games have grown in scope and have become more challenging than ever because we have the capability and because we want to experience all they have to offer.

Games have changed, but I don’t think they’re more challenging.  Heard of Contra?  We see new games now that make use of greater physics and memory.  Look at the expanse of Grand Theft Auto!  Nintendo is making new “games” with new interfaces.  Some of which I think cease to be “video games.”  Like the new Wii Music (even Mr. Miyamoto agrees).  Doesn’t mean it isn’t fun.

As far as tragic gaming goes…it’s not like we have a bunch of Shakespeare’s programming and designing them. The attitude of the companies is make the gamer happy, make some money, make more games for the happy gamer. The few companies that take an artistic approach to gaming sometimes succeed in creating something new, exciting, hopefully different, but it’s not what the consumer is used too.

Completely agree.  And honestly, I don’t know if we want to go the tragic route.  I don’t think it would make money.  I don’t see the point.  During the Middle Ages tragedy actually fell off of the face of the earth.  Wasn’t rediscovered until Chaucer.  It’s not like we NEED it.  Why can’t “video games” simply be mindless entertainment?  That’s all they need to be.  And honestly, the more I think about it given my set parameters, it’s all they can be.
Advertisements
This entry was posted in Video Gaming. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to More Tragic Gaming

  1. The Disenfranchised Voice of He Who Once Walked Among Us says:

    So what you’re saying in that last paragraph then is that this entire string of posts is pretty much mute? >_>

  2. Keljeck says:

    No, I’m saying what I’ve been saying, and driving to more of a conclusion!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s