Tragic Gaming

I suppose I’ve thought enough about this over the past two weeks to present something.  First, we need to define what we mean by “Tragedy”  then what we mean by “Video Game” after all, what we set out to do here is think way too much.

Let’s start with Aristotle’s definition of Tragedy and work from there.  In his Poetics Ari said:

“Tragedy is an imitation of an action that is admirable, complete (composed of an introduction, a middle part and an ending), and possesses magnitude; in language made pleasurable, each of its species separated in different parts; performed by actors, not through narration; effecting through pity and fear the purification of such emotions.”

So in short, it’s a play with a beginning, middle, and end that is big, sounds cool, has various acts, is not narrated, and achieves a catharsis, in other words one feels sad for the Tragic Hero.  It has been said that the Tragic Hero is a great man who through his or her ΄αμαρτια (Hamartia) meets an end and we feel sorry for that person.  Since it is absolute and irredeemable.  This I believe is actually incorrect.  Hamartia literally means “to miss the mark” in fact, it is the word St. Paul uses in his epistles to refer to what we call sin.  Rather what we see in Greek tragedy is a hero so great, that he or she dares defy the Gods, or man.  In essence what tragic plays are about is the war between human and divine order.  Either/or we all lose.

But Tragedy has changed since then.  Take a look at Shakespeare.  Rather than in the plays of say Sophocles or Euripedes, there is hope.  When Oedipus’ father let him live, their fates were sealed.  Nothing could be changed.  When Juliet drank the potion, there was still hope.

In modern tragedy, anyone can be a tragic hero.  The Magnitude of a play need not cover whole realms, it could just be a simple household as in Death of a Salesman.

Anyway, now that I rattled on enough, I present a working definition of a tragedy.  Which is: A work of narrative art depicting the fall of a character in such a manner that we feel sorry for him or her.  This fall may be caused by their virtue, or vice, but it must always be the result of this virtue or vice ramming into the head of a God or Society.

Alright, got that.  A Tragedy has to end bad, but what’s a video game?  It’s just a game, that we play on video.  So what’s a game?  A game is a form of play featuring structured rules and a goal.  When one reaches the goal they get rewarded, generally.  At least we want something for completing a game.  In fact, all video games are like that.  You defeat a boss, you get a cutscene as a treat.  The boss drops loot, you continue on in the game.  Or if the game ends, there is a great feeling of satisfaction.  On the 360 now one can unlock achievements.  Blizzard is going to do the same thing in World of Warcraft.

Anyway, to put tragedy and gaming together one must merge the two definitions.  A tragic game is a form of play, which is acted out by the player in a structure of rules, trying to reach the goal, to be rewarded by their downfall.  The player feels sadness and pity.  In other words, by this definition a game must end poorly for the player character, and the player needs to feel sorry for it happening.

The closest “tragic game” off of the top of my head is Shadow of the Colossus, but I don’t know if I would consider it one.  Surely as a narrative it fits the tragic mold.  If I were to tell it as a story, or have it acted out as a play, we would all agree it’s a tragedy.  The hero dies at the end, at least that’s what I think.  And it’s a result of his virtue smashing head on not only into society but into a God.  So why don’t I consider this a “Tragic Game?”  

Simply because none of the tragic elements occur as a game.  Video games today are not pure video games, save perhaps puzzle games like Tetris.  Halo, Legend of Zelda, Mario, ect. are not pure games.  Why do I say that?  Because when I hit a home run in baseball, reality doesn’t stop for a cutscene.  All of the real tragic elements of Shadow of the Colossus occur in cutscenes.  All of the tragic elements of Final Fantasy X occur in cutscenes.  This is actually why I found Metal Gear Solid 3 to have a lot of genius in it, (SPOILER) The Boss only dies after you press the trigger button, even though it’s a cutscene.

This is the problem with tragic gaming.  The tragedy must be in the gameplay.  One must reach the goal, and in the heat of battle feel for the character and feel a sense of sadness and pity.  Needless to say, this is difficult.  What we really have is tragic “Interactive Entertainment,” and the reason we don’t see much of it is because game companies are even more Hollywood than Hollywood.  There’s no reason to attempt to make a really good plot when Halo, which wouldn’t even survive as a Hollywood Blockbuster, is making more than… well…. a Hollywood Blockbuster.

I suppose what this has been an exercise in is making definitions.  As far as games are today, tragedy can exist, but we only seem to do it in cutscenes.  It’s impossible to put it into the part that really matters, the game, because the player doesn’t want to die.  We have programmed the player to fight to live.  Look at Bioshock, a game that tries to pack in meaning but it doesn’t really matter.  Why add the altruism crap if the GAME PLAYS as me shooting everyone in sight in the streets?  And dying is not a reward, it’s a punishment.  I suppose there is a way to make this work, to play with the conceptions that gamers have of the games they play (and believe me, there are a lot of them) but there’s a fine line between doing it and making the gamer happy, and doing it and making the gamer insanely pissed off.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Video Gaming. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Tragic Gaming

  1. The Disenfranchised Voice of He Who Once Walked Among Us says:

    I feel the need to point out a few things, as is mandated by this kind of event, a comment is warranted by State Board Rule 36C.

    As far as defining a tragedy goes, whatever definition you choose to give it seems fine and well. However, we have to remember that everyone is going to experience things differently in relation to their own history and the story’s intrinsic relevance to their lives either past, present, or hopes of the future. As such, a tragedy for one could be…well possibly satire for another? In some sense at least, if they’d experienced the same thing perhaps? All I’m trying to say is it isn’t something we can exactly nail to the wall. It is the custard pie effect of definitions.

    Same goes for Video Games, not every game has a specific goal, objective, or in some case a set structure or rules. I would like to think that some games are made just to be played, and not to be rewarded for that play. Harvest Moon comes to mind, a game that in most incarnations can go on forever just farming. Your reward? Money to buy more crops and house extensions, extensions that are either for the most part useless or allow for more game-play options. Sure, they’re rewards, but then you still don’t necessarily have an end.

    Maybe now the case isn’t as much as it was back in the day, when after finally defeating Bowser and finding the freaking Princess, we get nothing. That was then. Now we’ve come to expect more. Games have grown in scope and have become more challenging than ever because we have the capability and because we want to experience all they have to offer.

    As far as tragic gaming goes…it’s not like we have a bunch of Shakespeare’s programming and designing them. The attitude of the companies is make the gamer happy, make some money, make more games for the happy gamer. The few companies that take an artistic approach to gaming sometimes succeed in creating something new, exciting, hopefully different, but it’s not what the consumer is used too.

    Not to mention we have a consumer base that could probably never come to a conclusive decision of what the perfect game would be. There’s too many interests, too many wants, and all the while there’s the companies trying to push out what they can to try and appease the base and maybe spark some new desires for the next installment.

    Anyways…I guess what’s trying to be said here is nothing too far off base from what you already said, except that we need to look at these things with new eyes, new perspectives. Over the years we’ve improved on the look, feel, and immersion of games, when there’s still so much left to discover. Look at Spore, Katamari Damacy, WoW, when we started with a limited array of colors and shapes, and to see where things have come, and to think that hopefully as we head into the future, we can see the same kind of expansion of game play.

  2. Pingback: More Tragic Gaming « A Nice Place

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s